Home | Gonzalez and Richards Chapter Two >> |
---|
June, 2005 |
Gonzalez and Richards Intro and Chapter One |
Posted by Gerald Vreeland at 6/27/2005 11:15:00 AM (2 comments left) |
Book(s) Review: Dan Brown, Deception Point (
One of the more surrealistic reading experiences you might engage in is to read Dan Brownâs Deception Point and Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay W. Richardsâ The Privileged Planet at the same time. In the Brown novel, the theory is that, since we cannot, find intelligent life anywhere in the universe (presumably including Earth) a meteorite crashes into earth comprised of sedimentary rock and a colony of â get this â giant fossilized lice. Bang your head on the desk a couple of times, take a deep breath and warp yourself into another universe wherein we evolved from the primordial slime and Earth was seeded by aliens and â like angels and Demons or The Da Vinci Code â you can just hang on for a Dan Brown kind of ride. Just ignore the traditional factoid page that always gets Brown into trouble with people who think. Because it is a novel, I will let you take the rest of the thrill ride without me.
Conversely, Gonzalez and Richards have a riveting introduction to their work, subtitled: âHow our place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery.â After reading a review in Astronomy magazine wherein the book was panned, I went on-line to try and find out what the problem was â the reviewer left me clueless! I discovered that it is in the genre of âIntelligent Designâ and the pseudo-intelligentsia, in its relentless attempt to stifle thinking people, simply lampoons rather than engages. After firing off a letter to the editor of Astronomy in which I trashed the review and pointed out the lack of credentials of the reviewer, I went right out and bought the book. I have not been disappointed! |
In their introduction, G and R break âthe correlationâ to us gently (p. xi). The correlation they will spend the rest of the book exploring is the relationship between âmeasurabilityâ and âhabitability.â It is their version of âthe anthropic principleâ which goes something like this: the universe looks the way it does because we are here to see it. Or, as one more eminent scholar has it: â. . . the anthropic principle . . . can be paraphrased as âWe see the universe the way it is because we existââ (Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time [New York: Bantam, 1988, 96], 128.)
The first chapter, âWonderful Eclipsesâ is on the relationship between the Sun, Moon and Earth. It begins with a first person narrative from Dr. Gonzalez when, in
In addition, these guys believe in an ancient universe, and so they note that only at this time would the apparent sizes of the Sun and Moon be such that we could explore them in this way â right when we are here to do so! All we CRI types need is the calculus necessary to speed things up â it is still right here, right now and it is still us looking. Fudge-factor? Planck time! That first bazillionth of a second when none of the rules of Physics pertained and the universe was said to expand at 50 times the speed of light. Just extend it to the first four days of Creation, put the earth âsafely in the hollow of Godâs handâ and youâve got it. . . . And, surprise, youâve got a universe that kind of looks like our and observers kind of like us to look at it.
Alright, cut to the chase, Jerry. What can we learn from all this astrophysics?
Eclipses are esthetically astounding â astronomers and laymen alike routinely cry when they see a perfect one. If we ever get one here, I have a piece of plastic that will help us look directly at them . . . Iâve done so twice and seen the reaction in my friends.
Secondly, we can learn from spectrographic instruments about the constituent elements of the sun and other stars.
Third, we can study solar prominences â those million mile long flames that rise from the sunâs âsurface.â
Fourth, we are able to study the General Law of Relativity by observing the bending of starlight by Solar gravitation.
From that we can do all sorts of things simply because of the perfect relationship between these three geometric celestial friends. For instance, I think one way to disprove the theory of Special Relativity (E = mc2) has to do with the bending of stellar light from the solar gravitational field. If huge bodies can bend light, they can accelerate it and decelerate it! If they can do that c isnât c any more (c = âconstantâ or lightspeed = 186,000 miles per second). Things are changing and in Physics, gravity not light is God. For us, we marvel at the God who controls all four of the forces found by physicists. When Physicists finally arrive at a âtheory of everythingâ or Quantum theory of Gravity, they will find a bunch of theologians sitting around a table feasting, no? |